Author Topic: Game 132: Jays at Rays  (Read 352 times)

Online Darryl

  • Administrator
  • All Star
  • *****
  • Posts: 3690
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Ok Blue Jays
Game 132: Jays at Rays
« on: August 31, 2010, 06:38:27 PM »
Jays just jumped in front 5-3
2010 - OKBJ Fantasy Baseball Champion

Online Darryl

  • Administrator
  • All Star
  • *****
  • Posts: 3690
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Ok Blue Jays
Re: Game 132: Jays at Rays
« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2010, 06:45:25 PM »
Floodgates have opened . 8-3 Jays
2010 - OKBJ Fantasy Baseball Champion

Online Darryl

  • Administrator
  • All Star
  • *****
  • Posts: 3690
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Ok Blue Jays
Re: Game 132: Jays at Rays
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2010, 06:52:55 PM »
Bautista joins the party with a 3 run shot. 11-3 Jays.
2010 - OKBJ Fantasy Baseball Champion

Offline bogeygolfer

  • Double AA
  • ****
  • Posts: 895
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Game 132: Jays at Rays
« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2010, 11:31:09 PM »
sportsnet one, look what you did this game thread

Offline Stieb

  • Rookie Ball
  • **
  • Posts: 136
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Game 132: Jays at Rays
« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2010, 04:54:25 AM »
sportsnet one, look what you did this game thread

i called my service provider regarding the free preview (eastlink here in the maritimes) they claim to be working on getting the channel and she went so far to say that only roger's customers have access to it now?

regardless i hope they get this worked out, if "one" is to show 25 games THIS SEASON we're going to be missing a lot of games down the stretch...

Offline London Knights

  • Double AA
  • ****
  • Posts: 968
    • View Profile
Re: Game 132: Jays at Rays
« Reply #5 on: September 01, 2010, 06:55:05 AM »
What I find funniest about the whole SNet-One garbage is how dumb Rogers thinks we are.  Last year when Rogers was on the wrong end of the TSN2 issue with the Raptors games, they cried foul and TSN creating a channel and not offering it to Rogers to give to its customers.

Now this year Rogers creates SNet-One (feeds the fans of the Jays a load of crap about games not going to be aired anyway without the channel....while managing to shove Yankees, Red Sox, and Mariners games down my throat on SNet Ontario/East/West/Pacific/National) and then claims that the other stations are the ones at fault for not carrying the channel.

Load of bull Rogers, I'm not a moron, I know exactly what happened/is happening, and it isn't Bell, Cogeco, Starchoice, and every other major and minor cable/satellite providers fault.

Offline bogeygolfer

  • Double AA
  • ****
  • Posts: 895
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Game 132: Jays at Rays
« Reply #6 on: September 01, 2010, 05:34:45 PM »
What I find funniest about the whole SNet-One garbage is how dumb Rogers thinks we are.  Last year when Rogers was on the wrong end of the TSN2 issue with the Raptors games, they cried foul and TSN creating a channel and not offering it to Rogers to give to its customers.

Now this year Rogers creates SNet-One (feeds the fans of the Jays a load of crap about games not going to be aired anyway without the channel....while managing to shove Yankees, Red Sox, and Mariners games down my throat on SNet Ontario/East/West/Pacific/National) and then claims that the other stations are the ones at fault for not carrying the channel.

Load of bull Rogers, I'm not a moron, I know exactly what happened/is happening, and it isn't Bell, Cogeco, Starchoice, and every other major and minor cable/satellite providers fault.
what bugs me that they using us fans as ponds in there negotiations, its not like tsn 2 that had pretty much all the providers on board (except rogers) before the NBA season started. This is much worse, I mean stupid vice president of rogers admitted that negotiations WITH ROGERS went down to wire, imagine THAT!!! Two companies owned by the same corporations!!